SiteData Community

Presidential candidate number two, Prabowo Subianto, attended to the difficulties dealt with by farmers in getting plant food, especially in the region of Central Java. He made these remarks in feedback to statements by presidential prospect Ganjar Pranowo relating to administration and the enhancement of public solutions, especially for at risk teams, including ladies, children, and individuals with impairments.
Prabowo initially discussed that at risk teams, including farmers and anglers, dealt with troubles. He shared his observations from his sees in Central Java, where he ran into issues associated with plant food access. He specified, "In my sight, prone groups also consist of farmers and anglers. During my check outs, particularly in Central Java, I found that farmers there had problem acquiring fertilizer."
Prabowo disclosed that lots of farmers had grievances regarding Ganjar's program during his tenure as Governor, understood as the Farmer's Card (Kartu Tani), which was meant to provide agricultural support. Prabowo highlighted that farmers really desired an easier procedure for obtaining plant food.
On the other hand, presidential candidate number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, reacted to an inquiry regarding administration and the improvement of public services during the argument. Ganjar was asked about his calculated program to enhance the high quality of equitable public services.
Ganjar began by discussing his 10 years of experience in attending to such issues and stated, "I have 10 years of experience in handling this issue, engaging them initially." He detailed two key methods to deal with the concern.
First, he highlighted the relevance of entailing ladies, people with impairments, kids, and even parents in every Musrenbang (regional advancement planning meeting). This comprehensive approach aimed to make sure that these teams' issues and needs were considered in decision-making procedures. Ganjar believed that accomplishing equality in advancement planning was important to represent what these teams wished for, ultimately lowering complaints.
Secondly, Ganjar stressed the need for public oversight of government companies. He proposed a government super app that consisted of a public issue mechanism. He highlighted that the federal government needs to not be delicate to objection and must actively receive feedback and input from the public. Ganjar promoted for the highest degree of federal government to take action when needed, ultimately resulting in boosted services and the affirmation of these vulnerable teams.
In summary, Prabowo Subianto voiced issues about farmers' accessibility to fertilizer in Central Java, while Ganjar Pranowo outlined his strategic strategy to improve civil services, emphasizing inclusivity and public oversight as vital elements of his technique during the presidential debate.

The National Project Team (TKN) of Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka has convened a group of 98 protestors to prepare for the presidential argument carried out by the General Election Payment (KPU) on Tuesday, December 12, 2023. The inaugural presidential debate will certainly concentrate on themes such as regulation, civils rights, administration, anti-corruption efforts, and enhancing democracy.
Nusron Wahid, the Secretary of TKN Prabowo-Gibran, exposed that the celebration of these 98 lobbyists was triggered by one of the discussion's styles, namely human civil liberties (PORK). He noted that inquiries pertaining to Prabowo's past would invariably arise, considered that presidential political elections occur every five years. Nusron Wahid shared these insights during a press conference at the TKN Prabowo-Gibran Media Center in Kebayoran Baru, South Jakarta, on Monday, December 11, 2023.
One of the 98 protestors, Budiman Sudjatmiko, who additionally serves as a Participant of the Specialist Council for TKN Prabowo-Gibran, highlighted that problems connected to events from 25 years ago have been dealt with both politically and legitimately. Budiman made clear that politically, Prabowo formerly worked as the vice-presidential candidate together with Megawati throughout the 2009 political election, symbolizing that present competitors in the autonomous process have already recognized there are no political problems with Prabowo.
Additionally, Budiman explained that Prabowo has twice joined governmental elections, symbolizing that he has actually been legitimately acknowledged within the electoral system. He insisted that Prabowo is fit for the duty, without lawful proof recommending criminal involvement. Hence, he emphasized that Prabowo has belonged to the autonomous process for 25 years, both historically and in the present.
Throughout the celebration, Budiman additionally revealed the factors for supporting the Prabowo-Gibran ticket. He expressed the idea that Prabowo-Gibran represents the connection and enhancement of the accomplishments of the previous 25 years. He emphasized the demand for unity, especially despite boosting obstacles, as they jointly endeavor to fulfill their duties to the nation and history.
Natalius Pigai, a former Commissioner of the National Payment on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) from 2012 to 2017, asserted that Prabowo Subianto is not implicated in any kind of accusations of civils rights misuses. Pigai made this statement after assessing Komnas pork's investigation searchings for. Here's more regarding Jokowi bicara Kaesang - https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/5611984/ini-reaksi-kaesang-soal-jokowi-disebut-larang-dirinya-maju-di-pilkada-jakarta - check out the webpage. He highlighted that Prabowo's name does not appear in the verdicts regarding instances of human rights violations.
In addition, Pigai cleared up that neither Ganjar Pranowo nor Anies Baswedan's names show up in the listing of suspected civils rights violators. Hence, he asserted that all presidential candidates in the 2024 election are clear of claims associated with human rights violations. Pigai identified any type of claims against Prabowo as verbal physical violence, hate speech, and disrespect.
Pigai contended that complaints of Prabowo's involvement in significant human legal rights misuses are mainly politically motivated, meant to gain an advantage over political opponents. He emphasized that Komnas HAM is the single organization constitutionally empowered to carry out examinations right into human legal rights violations. According to Pigai, the outcomes of Komnas pork's queries include no mention of Prabowo Subianto.