SiteData Community

On the evening of Tuesday, December 12, 2023, presidential candidate number two, Prabowo Subianto, participated in the first governmental dispute for the 2024 political election at the General Political Election Compensation (KPU) workplace in Menteng, Jakarta. During this occasion, Prabowo participated in a debate with presidential candidate leading, Anies Baswedan, concerning air contamination in Jakarta.
Prabowo confiscated the chance to pose a concern to Anies, who acted as the former Governor of Jakarta, about the extreme air contamination in the funding city.
" DKI (Jakarta) frequently receives the greatest air contamination index in the world. Exactly how is it that with a budget plan of Rp80 trillion, Mr. Anies could not do something substantial to decrease air pollution?" Prabowo asked.
Anies responded by discussing the presence of air pollution monitoring gadgets in Jakarta. He highlighted that when pollution stems from within the city, it continues to be continually high-- today, tomorrow, or the complying with week.
Air pollution does not have an ID card, and the wind doesn't have an ID card. When contaminants from power plants flow into Jakarta, the city signs up high air pollution degrees. When air pollution moves to Lampung or Sumatra, there are no monitoring gadgets there," Anies cleared up.
Anies continued to describe the procedures required to attend to air pollution, consisting of emissions control from car, the electrification of mass transit, and the conversion of public cars.
" In the past, there were 350,000 day-to-day guests on public transport; currently, there are 1 million everyday travelers. We've been working with this to tackle contamination in Jakarta," Anies reacted.
Prabowo offered his viewpoint on Anies's response, sharing complication over Anies's propensity to associate air pollution in Jakarta to the wind.
" It's testing when we blame the wind. If we blame the wind and rain, possibly we don't need a federal government," Prabowo said.
Prabowo's Action to Ganjar's Question Relating to the Constitutional Court's Choice on the Presidential Candidate Age Limitation
Presidential prospect number three, Ganjar Pranowo, presented a question to presidential candidate number two, Prabowo Subianto, pertaining to the Constitutional Court's choice on the age restriction for governmental and vice-presidential candidates. Here is Prabowo's reaction throughout the very first presidential debate for the 2024 election held at the General Election Payment (KPU) office in Menteng, Jakarta, on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.
I have to ask this concern. Ganjar asked.
Prabowo was approved the chance to respond to Ganjar's question.
"Regarding the Constitutional Court, the regulations are clear. We are not kids; our individuals are smart and recognize the process. That interfered? The key point is that we maintain the constitution and the regulation. We improve what is not best, and we are dedicated to following the regulation itself," Prabowo replied.

Presidential prospect number 3, Ganjar Pranowo, questioned concerning the resolution of major civils rights infractions cases through an Impromptu Civil Rights Tribunal and the search for the sufferers. He made these statements during the presidential argument for the 2024 elections held at the KPU RI office in Jakarta on Tuesday, December 12, 2023.
He detailed 12 events including serious human legal rights offenses. Additionally, he pointed out that the Indonesian Parliament (DPR) had released 4 suggestions to the then-president in 2009, including the facility of an Advertisement Hoc Civil Rights Tribunal and discovering targets of forced disappearances.
"If you were in that setting, would you develop a civils rights tribunal and comply with the DPR's suggestions? 2nd concern, several mommies are waiting out there; can you assist in finding the whereabouts of the missing individuals so they can pay their areas?" Ganjar asked Prabowo.
In feedback, Prabowo mentioned that the 2009 concern concerning the DPR's suggestions had actually currently been resolved by Mahfud MD, Ganjar's running companion. The Chairman of Gerindra Party felt that he had regularly reacted to inquiries about human legal rights infractions that were always connected to him.
"This concern has in fact been taken care of by your vice head of state (Mahfud MD). What else do you want me to answer? I have actually answered it a number of times; there's an electronic record of it. I have actually addressed it several times, every 5 years, when my polling numbers rise, it gets asked once again," Prabowo claimed.
"Do you know the information? You can ask the Regional Police Principal (Kapolda), the amount of individuals have gone missing in Jakarta this year? This year. Bodies have been uncovered just recently, and more, c'mon, Mr. Ganjar. I claim that I highly promote for human legal rights," he proceeded.
Prabowo then stated former political detainees from the New Order age who currently support him. It deserves keeping in mind that one of them, Budiman Sudjatmiko, has joined Prabowo-Gibran's campaign.
"Actually, those who were once sent to prison, political detainees. They asserted I kidnapped them, today they get on my side, supporting me, my dear fellow countrymen. Do not politicize the concern of human civil liberties, in my opinion," Prabowo mentioned.
Unsatisfied with Prabowo's action, Ganjar expressed his disappointment. He felt that Prabowo did not directly address the inquiries he postured.
"Mr. Prabowo has unbelievable decisiveness, exceptionally strong. However however, in these two responses, he did not have that decisiveness. Why do I say this? My concern was really one: if you end up being president, will you develop a civils rights tribunal? The 2nd inquiry, can you locate, show, and aid the households locate the missing out on people? Both of these were not addressed," he stated.
"If I may request, if I end up being president, I will solve this. That in the context of the next presidential political election, this concern will certainly not resurface since the head of state is definitive and finishes this job during my term," Ganjar clarified.
Prabowo responded once again, disputing the idea that he was not company in his stance. He considered Ganjar's concerns to be tendentious.
"I am company in maintaining civils rights. The inquiry you asked is rather tendentious. Why are you asking me about the 13 missing individuals from that time? That's tendentious, Mr. Ganjar. Your running friend has actually been managing this the whole time. So if the decision is to establish an Advertisement Hoc Civil Rights Tribunal, we will certainly do it. There's no worry," he replied.
"Initiatives," Prabowo ended.

For more information regarding pilkada Jakarta nama baru; www.liputan6.com, stop by our website.