SiteData Community

This change benefited Gibran Rakabuming Raka, that consequently ended up being Prabowo Subianto's running mate. Prabowo insisted that in a freedom, ultimate power relaxes with the people, and the greatest authority is the body politic. If their selections were incorrect, Prabowo recognized that the people would hold him accountable.

Conclusion: Based upon our examination, Prabowo's declaration that legislation, PORK, and anti-corruption efforts are placed at the top of Prabowo-Gibran's vision and mission is partially proper. In their vision and goal, HAM is undoubtedly placed as factor top. Nonetheless, legislation and anti-corruption efforts are put in the 7th point of their goal.

During the governmental argument held on Tuesday, December 12, 2023, governmental prospect Prabowo Subianto discussed the complex issue of dealing with disputes in Papua. Prabowo acknowledged that dealing with Papua is a difficult matter with international disturbance and highlighted the importance of civils rights (HAM) as the main concern, prioritizing the defense of individuals.
However, according to Ganjar Pranowo, the solutions recommended by Prabowo are not sufficient. Ganjar shared his perspective that discussion is necessary to bring together all stakeholders to resolve the issue properly.
Ganjar's statement during the discussion was as complies with: "In my point of view, Mr. Prabowo, it does not seem to be sufficient. Dialogue is something critical so that all celebrations can rest with each other, as it is the origin of the issue. Do you concur with the discussion design I am suggesting?"
Along with his feedback during the argument, Ganjar Pranowo additionally shared his experiences from his campaign trail with his running friend, Mahfud Md. They began on a trip from the easternmost factor in Sabang to Merauke in the west, intending to pay attention to and observe the hopes and demands of individuals.
Ganjar expressed his commitment to boosting all public centers, If you have any concerns about the place and how to use Jokowi menang menteri, you can make contact with us at our web site. from medical care to education and learning, based on the desires and responses received during their campaign. Ganjar vowed to carry out a program of one medical care worker per village to resolve such obstacles.
Moreover, Ganjar Pranowo mentioned a concern discovered during their visit to Sabang, where they located that educators were not getting sufficient attention and assistance from the federal government. He stressed the demand for raised focus and support around.
In verdict, Ganjar Pranowo responded to Prabowo Subianto's method to handling the Papua problem by highlighting the importance of discussion and shared his dedication to resolving different public problems, especially in health care and education, based on his campaign experiences.

Governmental prospect (Capres) Ganjar Pranowo specified that the deficiency of subsidized fertilizers is not restricted to Central Java, refuting accusations made by Governmental candidate number 2, Prabowo Subianto, throughout the Presidential Discussion. In the debate, Prabowo criticized the farmer card (kartu tani) policy executed by Ganjar Pranowo while he was serving as the Governor of Central Java, declaring that it made it hard for farmers to gain access to subsidized fertilizers.
In response to Prabowo's findings, Governmental prospect number 3 clarified that the deficiency of subsidized fertilizers is not exclusive to Central Java. He pointed out that this concern prevails in other areas of Indonesia also, such as Papua, North Sumatra, East Nusa Tenggara (NTT), West Nusa Tenggara (NTB), East Kalimantan, and despite having gas. Ganjar mentioned, "However, for Mr. Prabowo, I should remind him that the deficiency of fertilizer is likewise taking place in Papua, North Sumatra, NTT, NTB, East Kalimantan, consisting of gasoline."
Is Ganjar's statement regarding the deficiency of subsidized plant foods not being limited to Central Java accurate? Allow's fact-check this insurance claim.
Fact-Checking:
In a short article labelled "Farmers in Garut Complain Concerning the Scarcity of Subsidized Fertilizers and Farmer Card Distribution," released on the bandung.bisnis.com website on March 19, 2023, it was reported that several teams of farmers in Garut Rule, West Java, were facing troubles in getting subsidized fertilizers. A participant of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) of West Java, Deden Galih, pointed out that in some areas of Garut Regency, farmers were locating it testing to accessibility subsidized fertilizers, and when they might get them, it was commonly at high costs.
In this post, Otong Wiranta, the Chairman of the Contact Farmers and Fishermen Empowerment (KTNA) of West Java, mentioned that the circulation of subsidized fertilizers was still dealing with different difficulties in the area. Some of the challenges included farmers not being registered, and also registered farmers not being able to redeem subsidized fertilizers.
In a post titled "Farmers in Katingan Kuala Complain Concerning the Shortage of Subsidized Fertilizers," released on the dayaknews.com site, it was reported that farmers in Bangun Jaya Village, Katingan Kuala Subdistrict, Katingan Rule, Central Kalimantan, were complaining regarding the deficiency of subsidized fertilizers and medications. Yuda Anwar, a participant of the Mekar Jaya Farmers Team in Bangun Jaya Town, mentioned that the shortage of fertilizers and medications had actually resulted in much less productive rice crops and had negatively influenced harvest yields. He mentioned that lots of rice crops were shriveling due to an absence of nutrients and were prone to pest attacks.
Verdict:
Based on the fact-checking, Ganjar Pranowo's declaration that the deficiency of subsidized fertilizers is not limited to Central Java is exact. Records from numerous areas in Indonesia, including West Java and Central Kalimantan, confirm that farmers have actually been dealing with difficulties in accessing subsidized plant foods. This details negates Prabowo Subianto's case that the problem was unique to Central Java.